Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28802
Title: | Understanding self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility in people with and without lifetime anorexia nervosa. | Austin Authors: | Miles, Stephanie;Nedeljkovic, Maja;Sumner, Philip;Phillipou, Andrea | Affiliation: | Mental Health Department of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia |
Issue Date: | Sep-2022 | Date: | 2022-02-10 | Publication information: | Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2022; 27(5): 325-341 | Abstract: | Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious eating disorder associated with several cognitive difficulties including poor cognitive flexibility (i.e. difficulties in effectively adapting to changes in the environment and/or changing task demands). AN research has primarily assessed cognitive flexibility using neurocognitive tests, and little is known about the differences or similarities between self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility. This study investigated the relationship between self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility in people with no history of an eating disorder (n = 207) and people with a self-reported lifetime diagnosis of AN (n = 19).Methods: Participants completed self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility through an online study.Results: No significant correlations were found between self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility for either group of the sample, suggesting that these assessments may evaluate different aspects of cognitive flexibility. Further, negative mood and self-reported eating disorder symptoms were found to significantly relate to self-reported cognitive flexibility, but were not associated with performance on neurocognitive tests of cognitive flexibility.Conclusions: To provide a comprehensive understanding of perceived and objective cognitive flexibility in AN, future research and clinical assessments should include both self-report and neurocognitive assessments. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28802 | DOI: | 10.1080/13546805.2022.2038554 | ORCID: | 0000-0001-8190-894X 0000-0003-0963-0335 0000-0003-1009-6619 |
Journal: | Cognitive Neuropsychiatry | PubMed URL: | 35142252 | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35142252/ | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Cognitive assessment eating disorders executive function neurocognitive test set-shifting |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.