Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27170
Title: Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review.
Austin Authors: Lipson-Smith, Ruby;Pflaumer, Luis;Elf, Marie;Blaschke, Sarah-May;Davis, Aaron;White, Marcus;Zeeman, Heidi;Bernhardt, Julie
Affiliation: Centre for Design Innovation, The Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, Melbourne, Australia
The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
Issue Date: 5-Aug-2021
Date: 2021-08-05
Publication information: BMJ Open 2021; 11(8): e050247
Abstract: To identify, appraise and synthesise existing design evidence for inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; to identify impacts of these built environments on the outcomes and experiences of people recovering from stroke, their family/caregivers and staff. A convergent segregated review design was used to conduct a systematic review. Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for articles published between January 2000 and November 2020. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies investigating the impact of the built environment of inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke survivors, their family/caregivers and/or staff. Two authors separately completed the title, abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Extracted data were categorised according to the aspect of the built environment explored and the outcomes reported. These categories were used to structure a narrative synthesis of the results from all included studies. Twenty-four articles were included, most qualitative and exploratory. Half of the included articles investigated a particular aspect of the built environment, including environmental enrichment and communal areas (n=8), bedroom design (n=3) and therapy spaces (n=1), while the other half considered the environment in general. Findings related to one or more of the following outcome categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) patient activity, (3) patient well-being, (4) patient and/or staff safety and (5) clinical practice. Heterogeneous designs and variables of interest meant results could not be compared, but some repeated findings suggest that attractive and accessible communal areas are important for patient activity and well-being. Stroke rehabilitation is a unique healthcare context where patient activity, practice and motivation are paramount. We found many evidence gaps that with more targeted research could better inform the design of rehabilitation spaces to optimise care. CRD42020158006.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27170
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050247
ORCID: 0000-0002-1702-8144
0000-0001-9956-4639
0000-0001-7044-8896
0000-0003-2737-3379
0000-0002-1477-7406
0000-0002-2787-8484
Journal: BMJ Open
PubMed URL: 34353805
Type: Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Subjects: health services administration & management
rehabilitation medicine
stroke medicine
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.