Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26760
Title: Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice.
Austin Authors: McDougall, Rosalind J;White, Ben P;Ko, Danielle ;Keogh, Louise;Willmott, Lindy
Affiliation: Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Palliative Care
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Quality and Patient Safety
Issue Date: 14-Jun-2021
metadata.dc.date: 2021-06-14
Publication information: Journal of Medical Ethics 2021; online first: 14 June
Abstract: In jurisdictions where voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is legal, eligibility assessments, prescription and administration of a VAD substance are commonly performed by senior doctors. Junior doctors' involvement is limited to a range of more peripheral aspects of patient care relating to VAD. In the Australian state of Victoria, where VAD has been legal since June 2019, all health professionals have a right under the legislation to conscientiously object to involvement in the VAD process, including provision of information about VAD. While this protection appears categorical and straightforward, conscientious objection to VAD-related care is ethically complex for junior doctors for reasons that are specific to this group of clinicians. For junior doctors wishing to exercise a conscientious objection to VAD, their dependence on their senior colleagues for career progression creates unique risks and burdens. In a context where senior colleagues are supportive of VAD, the junior doctor's subordinate position in the medical hierarchy exposes them to potential significant harms: compromising their moral integrity by participating, or compromising their career progression by objecting. In jurisdictions intending to provide all health professionals with meaningful conscientious objection protection in relation to VAD, strong specific support for junior doctors is needed through local institutional policies and culture.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26760
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107125
ORCID: 0000-0002-3809-2575
0000-0003-3365-939X
0000-0003-2963-6451
0000-0002-9750-287X
PubMed URL: 34127526
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: conscientious objection
euthanasia
voluntary assisted dying
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Jun 29, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.