Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||How Positive Are Conversion Disorder Diagnoses?: Patterns of Referral to a Functional Neurology Clinic.||Austin Authors:||Nikrad, Ehsan;Kanaan, Richard A A||Affiliation:||Psychiatry (University of Melbourne)||Issue Date:||1-Oct-2021||metadata.dc.date:||2021-05-27||Publication information:||The Journal of nervous and mental disease 2021-10-01; 209(10): 743-746||Abstract:||The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for conversion disorder have replaced the criterion of evidence of a "psychogenic" etiology with a criterion that patients must be "positively" diagnosed on the basis of their neurological assessment. We retrospectively studied referrals to a specialist functional neurology clinic to see how commonly the new criteria were met since DSM-5's introduction. Positive signs were reported in a quarter of referrals (26.5%), which was associated with diagnosticians' confidence (p = 0.001) and with the clinic confirming the diagnosis (p = 0.01). Our clinic found positive signs in 28.6% of the referrals. In 13 (13.3%) patients, the new criterion was not met. In conclusion, positive signs are diagnostically helpful but are only reported in a minority of assessments. A significant group of those currently believed to have conversion disorder would not meet the revised diagnostic criteria based on this.||URI:||https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26615||DOI:||10.1097/NMD.0000000000001372||Journal:||The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease||PubMed URL:||34048413||Type:||Journal Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Show full item record
checked on Jun 8, 2023
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.