Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26100
Title: | Public knowledge, preferences and experiences about medical substitute decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey. | Austin Authors: | Sellars, Marcus ;Tran, Julien;Nolte, Linda ;White, Ben;Sinclair, Craig;Fetherstonhaugh, Deirdre;Detering, Karen M | Affiliation: | Department of Health Services Research & Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Advance Care Planning Faculty of Health, Arts and Innovation, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | 15-Mar-2021 | Date: | 2021-03-15 | Publication information: | BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2021; online first: 15 March | Abstract: | To describe the Australian adult public's knowledge and experiences regarding substitute decision-making for medical decisions and their preferences for obtaining information about the substitute decision-maker (SDM) role. This is a national cross-sectional online survey of the Australian adult public. The survey examined participants' advance care planning (ACP) awareness and experience, SDM experiences and preferences for obtaining more information about SDM, and participant knowledge about SDM. Of 1586 people who opened the survey, 1120 (70.6%) were included in the final sample. 13% (n=142) of participants indicated they had acted as an SDM. A median score of two correct responses out of five showed low to moderate knowledge about the SDM role among all participants, with only 33% reporting awareness of SDM laws existing in Australia. While most (59%) participants ranked a health professional as their preferred source of obtaining information about supporting SDMs, few participants who had been an SDM (n=64, 45%) reported obtaining any support in making medical decisions. The median SDM knowledge scores for people who had discussed ACP (3.0 vs 2.0, U=1 45 222, z=6.910, p<0.001), documented their ACP preferences (3.0 vs 2.0, U=71 984, z=4.087, p<0.001) or acted in the SDM role (3.0 vs 2.0, U=56 353, z=-3.694, p<0.001) were significantly higher compared with those who had not. The Australian public may have low to moderate knowledge about the SDM role and access only minimal support when making challenging medical decisions. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26100 | DOI: | 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002619 | ORCID: | 0000-0002-8299-0313 0000-0003-3365-939X |
Journal: | BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care | PubMed URL: | 33722813 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | end of life care |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.