Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25905
Title: The future of continuous renal replacement therapy.
Austin Authors: See, Emily J ;Ronco, Claudio;Bellomo, Rinaldo 
Affiliation: Intensive Care
Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia
Chair of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.. International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), Vicenza, Italy.. Department of Nephrology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy..
Centre for Integrated Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
Issue Date: 20-Feb-2021
metadata.dc.date: 2021
Publication information: Seminars in Dialysis 2021; online first: 20 February
Abstract: Over the last 40¬†years, acute renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care units (ICUs) of high-income countries has transitioned from the predominant use of intermittent hemodialysis (and the much less common use of peritoneal dialysis) to the almost exclusive use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Accordingly, CRRT has become the most common form of vital organ support delivered to critically ill patients. A series of clinical and technical advances has enabled the transformation of basic CRRT machines into highly sophisticated and customized devices. Recent work has focused on using evidence from clinical trials to enhance the application of CRRT with regard to timing of initiation, choice of modality, dose, and anticoagulation. However, many questions remain unanswered. Uncertainty surrounding volume control and the utility of strategies to minimize circulatory stress are key areas for future development. Advances in membrane technology, combination with other extracorporeal therapies, and personalization of CRRT delivery may provide additional benefit to certain subgroups. Development of quality metrics and use of data analytics to audit and benchmark could provide important insight into practice, while biofeedback and automated CRRT prescription could increase safety. In this review, we summarize the evolution of CRRT and highlight several future areas for development.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25905
DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12961
ORCID: 0000-0003-4436-4319
PubMed URL: 33609407
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: continuous renal replacement therapy
hemodiafiltration
hemodialysis
hemofiltration
information technology
prescription
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

86
checked on May 15, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.