Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25735
Title: Does rectal tube/transanal stent placement after an anterior resection for rectal cancer reduce anastomotic leak? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Austin Authors: Choy, Kay T ;Yang, Tze Wei Wilson;Heriot, Alexander;Warrier, Satish K;Kong, Joseph C
Affiliation: Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Surgery
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jun-2021
Date: 2021-01-30
Publication information: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2021; 36(6): 1123-1132
Abstract: There is increasing evidence that either a transanal stent (TAS) or rectal tube (RT) can decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for rectal cancer, in which a diverting stoma may not be required. The aim of this review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of RT/TAS in preventing AL after anterior resections. An up-to-date systematic review was performed on the available literature between 2000 and 2020 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane Library databases. All studies reporting on anterior resections in adults, comparing transanal tube/stent versus non-tube/stent, were analysed. The primary outcome was rates of AL, whereas secondary outcomes compared associated unplanned re-operation for AL and hospital length of stay (LOS). Two randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies were included, with 1714 patients receiving RT/TAS and 1741 patients without. There were 119 (7%) patients with AL in the RT/TAS group compared to 216 (12.3%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38-0.62, p < 0.001). There were 47 (2.9%) patients with AL complications requiring surgery in the RT/TAS group compared to 132 (8%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.42, p < 0.001) and no significant difference identified with the standardized mean difference (SMD) favouring the RT/TAS group for hospital LOS (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.06, p = 0.115). The use of RT/TAS post restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer should be considered, given the benefits shown from this meta-analysis.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25735
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03851-8
ORCID: 0000-0001-5763-5742
Journal: International Journal of Colorectal Disease
PubMed URL: 33515307
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Anastomotic leak
Anterior resection
Decompression
Rectal tube
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on Oct 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.