Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25735
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoy, Kay T-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Tze Wei Wilson-
dc.contributor.authorHeriot, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorWarrier, Satish K-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Joseph C-
dc.date2021-01-30-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T04:24:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-01T04:24:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease 2021; 36(6): 1123-1132en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25735-
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing evidence that either a transanal stent (TAS) or rectal tube (RT) can decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for rectal cancer, in which a diverting stoma may not be required. The aim of this review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of RT/TAS in preventing AL after anterior resections. An up-to-date systematic review was performed on the available literature between 2000 and 2020 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane Library databases. All studies reporting on anterior resections in adults, comparing transanal tube/stent versus non-tube/stent, were analysed. The primary outcome was rates of AL, whereas secondary outcomes compared associated unplanned re-operation for AL and hospital length of stay (LOS). Two randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies were included, with 1714 patients receiving RT/TAS and 1741 patients without. There were 119 (7%) patients with AL in the RT/TAS group compared to 216 (12.3%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38-0.62, p < 0.001). There were 47 (2.9%) patients with AL complications requiring surgery in the RT/TAS group compared to 132 (8%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.42, p < 0.001) and no significant difference identified with the standardized mean difference (SMD) favouring the RT/TAS group for hospital LOS (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.06, p = 0.115). The use of RT/TAS post restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer should be considered, given the benefits shown from this meta-analysis.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAnastomotic leaken
dc.subjectAnterior resectionen
dc.subjectDecompressionen
dc.subjectRectal tubeen
dc.titleDoes rectal tube/transanal stent placement after an anterior resection for rectal cancer reduce anastomotic leak? A systematic review and meta-analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Colorectal Diseaseen
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00384-021-03851-8en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5763-5742en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33515307-
local.name.researcherChoy, Kay T
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on Oct 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.