Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25381
Title: First-in-Human Chronic Implant Experience of the Substernal Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Austin Authors: Crozier, Ian;Haqqani, Haris;Kotschet, Emily;Shaw, David;Prabhu, Anil;Roubos, Nicholas ;Alison, Jeffrey;Melton, Iain;Denman, Russell;Lin, Tina;Almeida, Aubrey;Portway, Bridget;Sawchuk, Robert;Thompson, Amy;Sherfesee, Lou;Liang, Samuel;Lentz, Linnea;DeGroot, Paul;Cheng, Alan;O'Donnell, David 
Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Department of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Department of Cardiac Rhythm Services, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia
Cardiology
Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Medtronic, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA
Issue Date: Nov-2020
Date: 2020-08-26
Publication information: JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology 2020; 6(12): 1525-1536
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of an extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Limitations of existing transvenous and subcutaneous ICD systems include lead reliability and morbidity issues associated with ICD lead implantation in the vasculature or lack of pacing therapies (e.g., antitachycardia pacing) in subcutaneous systems. The EV defibrillator uses a novel substernal lead placement to address these limitations. This was a prospective, nonrandomized, chronic pilot study conducted at 4 centers in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were 21 patients referred for ICD implantation. Patients received EV ICD systems. Data collection included major systemic and procedural adverse events, defibrillation testing at implantation, and sensing and pacing thresholds. Among 20 patients who underwent successful implantation, the median defibrillation threshold was 15 J, and 90% passed defibrillation testing with a ≥10-J safety margin. Mean R-wave amplitude was 3.4 ± 2.0 mV, mean ventricular fibrillation amplitude was 2.8 ± 1.7 mV, and pacing was successful in 95% at ≤10 V. There were no intraprocedural complications. Two patients have undergone elective chronic system removal since hospital discharge. In the 15 patients presently implanted, the systems are stable in long-term follow-up. This first-in-human evaluation of an EV ICD demonstrated the feasibility of substernal lead placement, defibrillation, and pacing with a chronically implanted system. There were no acute major complications, and pacing, defibrillation, and sensing performance at implantation were successful in most patients. (Extravascular ICD Pilot Study [EV ICD]; NCT03608670).
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25381
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.029
Journal: JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
PubMed URL: 33213813
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: ICD
anterior mediastinum
defibrillation
extravascular
substernal
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.