Austin Health

Title
Role of beta blockers following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.
Publication Date
2021
Author(s)
Peck, Kah Yong
Andrianopoulos, Nick
Dinh, Diem
Roberts, Louise
Duffy, Stephen J
Sebastian, Martin
Clark, David J
Brennan, Angela
Oqueli, Ernesto
Ajani, Andrew E
Reid, Christopher M
Freeman, Melanie
Teh, Andrew W
Subject
acute myocardial infarction
percutaneous coronary intervention
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
0000-0002-9160-6897
0000-0002-4518-5948
DOI
10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316605
Abstract
There is a paucity of evidence supporting routine beta blocker (BB) use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate BB use post PCI and its association with mortality. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the association between BB and mortality in the subgroups of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, LVEF 35%-50% and LVEF >50%. Using a large PCI registry, data from patients with ACS between January 2005 and June 2017 who were alive at 30 days were analysed. Those patients taking BB at 30 days were compared with those who were not taking BB. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The mean follow-up was 5.3±3.5 years. Of the 17 562 patients, 83.3% were on BB. Mortality was lower in the BB group (13.1% vs 19.5%, p=0.0001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed that BB use was associated with lower overall mortality (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, p=0.014). In the subgroup analysis, BB use was associated with reduced mortality in LVEF <35% (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.91, p=0.013), LVEF 35%-50% (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95, p=0.01), but not LVEF >50% (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.21, p=0.74). BB use remains high and is associated with reduced mortality. This reduction in mortality is primarily seen in those with reduced ejection fraction, but not in those with preserved ejection fraction.
Link
Citation
Heart 2021; 107(9): 728-733
Jornal Title
Heart

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink