Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23864
Title: Environmental sustainability in neurointerventional procedures: a waste audit.
Austin Authors: Shum, Pey Ling;Kok, Hong Kuan;Maingard, Julian;Schembri, Mark;Bañez, Ramon Martin Francisco;Van Damme, Vivienne;Barras, Christen;Slater, Lee-Anne;Chong, Winston;Chandra, Ronil V;Jhamb, Ashu;Brooks, Duncan Mark ;Asadi, Hamed 
Affiliation: Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Department of Interventional Radiology, St Vincent's Health Australia, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
School of Medicine, Deakin University Faculty of Health Medicine Nursing and Behavioural Sciences, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Interventional Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Nov-2020
metadata.dc.date: 2020-07-17
Publication information: Journal of neurointerventional surgery 2020; 12(11): 1053-1057
Abstract: Operating rooms contribute between 20% to 70% of hospital waste. This study aimed to evaluate the waste burden of neurointerventional procedures performed in a radiology department, identify areas for waste reduction, and motivate new greening initiatives. We performed a waste audit of 17 neurointerventional procedures at a tertiary-referral center over a 3-month period. Waste was categorized into five streams: general waste, clinical waste, recyclable plastic, recyclable paper, and sharps. Our radiology department started recycling soft plastics from 13 December 2019. Hence, an additional recyclable soft plastic waste stream was added from this time point. The weight of each waste stream was measured using a digital weighing scale. We measured the waste from seven cerebral digital subtraction angiograms (DSA), six mechanical thrombectomies (MT), two aneurysm-coiling procedures, one coiling with tumour embolization, and one dural arteriovenous fistula embolization procedure. In total, the 17 procedures generated 135.3 kg of waste: 85.5 kg (63.2%) clinical waste, 28.0 kg (20.7%) general waste, 14.7 kg (10.9%) recyclable paper, 3.5 kg (2.6%) recyclable plastic, 2.2 kg (1.6%) recyclable soft plastic, and 1.4 kg (1.0%) of sharps. An average of 8 kg of waste was generated per case. Coiling cases produced the greatest waste burden (13.1 kg), followed by embolization (10.3 kg), MT (8.8 kg), and DSA procedures (5.1 kg). Neurointerventional procedures generate a substantial amount of waste, an average of 8 kg per case. Targeted initiatives such as engaging with suppliers to revise procedure packs and reduce packaging, digitizing paper instructions, opening devices only when necessary, implementing additional recycling programs, and appropriate waste segregation have the potential to reduce the environmental impact of our specialty.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23864
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016380
ORCID: 0000-0002-4338-4951
0000-0003-2475-9727
0000-0001-5034-570X
PubMed URL: 32680876
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: angiography
arteriovenous malformation
coil
intervention
thrombectomy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on May 11, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.