Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23854
Title: Stone clearance times with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of a 1.5 mm ballistic/ultrasonic mini-probe vs. laser.
Austin Authors: Timm, Brennan ;Farag, Matthew ;Davis, Niall F;Webb, David ;Angus, David ;Troy, Andrew J ;Bolton, Damien M ;Jack, Gregory S 
Affiliation: Urology
Department of Urology, Beaumont and Connolly Hospitals, Dublin, Ireland..
Issue Date: 17-Jul-2020
metadata.dc.date: 2020-07-17
Publication information: Canadian Urological Association Journal 2020; online first: 17 July
Abstract: A limitation of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) is the narrow working channel of mini-nephroscopes, typically restricting instrumentation to 5 F or smaller. We evaluated the efficacy of the 1.5 mm Swiss Lithoclast® Trilogy (Trilogy) rigid probe and compared the results to consecutive cases performed with a 30 W Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser. A retrospective review of 30 consecutive mPCNL cases using the Trilogy and 30 W Holmium laser was performed. A 12-French (F) MIPS nephroscope with a 16.5 F access sheath and 6.7 F working channel was used for all mPCNL cases. The Trilogy was used with a disposable 1.5 mm x 440 mm probe with dual ultrasonic and ballistic energy. The Ho:YAG laser was used with a 550 micron fibre and a maximum of 30 W. Stone clearance time (SCT) was defined by the total time interval between activation of the lithotripter until insertion of the nephrostomy tube and measured in mm2/minutes. SCT included time for fragment retrieval, equipment adjustments, and rigid and flexible nephroscopy during and after lithotripsy. Eleven cases using a 1.5 mm Trilogy probe and 16 cases using a Ho:YAG laser met final inclusion criteria. Three cases using the Trilogy were excluded from final analysis due to conversion to alternative energy sources - two of those were upsized to standard PCNL and one was converted to laser. Mean stone diameter and density in the final Trilogy cohort was 26.7 mm and 1193 Hounsfield units (HU). Mean diameter and density in the laser cohort was 25.2 mm and 1049 HU. The mean stone area clearance time for Trilogy was 4.7±1.8 mm2/minute vs. 3.4±0.7 mm2/minute with Ho:YAG laser (p=0.21). For hard stones, defined as density >1000 HU, the Trilogy averaged 3.7±1.6 mm2/minutes, while the laser averaged 3.1±1.3 mm2/minutes (p=0.786). For soft stones, defined as <1000 HU, the Trilogy averaged 8.9±1.0 mm2/minutes compared to the Ho:YAG, which averaged 3.6±1.8mm2/minutes (p=0.019). No device0related complications occurred in either cohort. The 1.5 mm mPCNL Trilogy probe was comparable to 30 W Ho:YAG laser for clearing hard stones. The Trilogy performed better than laser on soft stones with a HU density <1000 HU.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23854
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6513
PubMed URL: 32701444
ISSN: 1911-6470
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Jun 19, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.