Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23853
Title: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of ileal conduit and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.
Austin Authors: Browne, Eva;Lawrentschuk, Nathan;Davis, Niall F
Affiliation: Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland..
Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 17-Jul-2020
Date: 2020
Publication information: Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada 2020; online first: 17 July
Abstract: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the long-term durability, incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction outcomes in ileal conduit (IC) and orthotopic neobladder (ONB). A systematic electronic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using MeSH and free-text search terms "Urinary diversion" AND "Ileal conduit" AND "Neobladder." The search concluded June 19, 2018. Inclusion criteria were those patients who had a cystectomy and required urinary diversion by either IC or neobladder. In total, 32 publications met the inclusion criteria. Data were available on 46 787 patients (n=36 719 for IC and n=10 068 for ONB). Meta-analyses showed that IC urinary diversions performed less favorably than ONB in terms of re-operation rates, Clavien-Dindo complications, and mortality rates; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.76 (1.24, 2.50) p<0.01, 1.16 (1.09, 1.22) p<0.01, and 6.29 (5.30, 7.48) p<0.01, respectively. IC urinary diversion performed better than ONB in relation to urinary tract infection rates and ureteric stricture rates, OR and 95% CI 0.67 (0.58, 0.77) p<0.01 and 0.70 (0.55, 0.89) p<0.01, respectively. Our results show that there is no significantly increased morbidity with ONB compared to IC. Selection of either urinary diversion technique should be based on factors such as tumor stage, comorbidities, surgical experience, and patient acceptance of postoperative sequalae.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23853
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6466
ORCID: 0000-0001-8553-5618
0000-0002-5298-1475
Journal: Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
PubMed URL: 32701445
ISSN: 1911-6470
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.