Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Predictors of ManuScript Rejection sYndrome (MiSeRY): a cohort study.
Austin Authors: Han, Hui-Chen ;Koshy, Anoop N ;Lin, Tina;Yudi, Matias B ;Clark, David J ;Teh, Andrew W ;Farouque, Omar 
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC
Issue Date: Dec-2019
Publication information: Medical Journal of Australia 2019; 211(11): 511-513
Abstract: To assess whether specific factors predict the development of ManuScript Rejection sYndrome (MiSeRY) in academic physicians. Prospective pilot study; participants self-administered a questionnaire about full manuscript submissions (as first or senior author) rejected at least once during the past 5 years. Single centre (tertiary institution). Eight academic physician-authors. Duration of grief. MiSeRY was pre-specified as prolonged grief (grief duration longer than the population median). Eight participants provided data on 32 manuscripts with a total of 93 rejections (median, two rejections per manuscript; interquartile range [IQR], 1-3 rejections per manuscript). Median age at rejection was 37 years (IQR, 33-45 years); 86% of 80 rejections involved male authors (86%), 56 of the authors providing data about these rejections were first authors (60%). The median journal impact factor was 5.9 (IQR, 5.2-17). In 48 cases of rejection (52%), pre-submission expectations of success had been high, and in 54 cases (58%) the manuscripts had been sent for external review. Median grief duration was 3 hours (IQR, 1-24 h). Multivariate analysis indicated that higher pre-submission expectation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.0; 95% CI, 1.5-18), first author status (aOR, 9.5; 95% CI, 1.1-77), and external review (aOR, 19.0; 95% CI 2.9-126) were independent predictors of MiSeRY. To help put authors out of their MiSeRY, journal editors could be more selective in the manuscripts they send for external review. Tempering pre-submission expectations and mastering the Coping and reLaxing Mechanisms (CaLM) of senior colleagues are important considerations for junior researchers.
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50414
ORCID: 0000-0002-8741-8631
PubMed URL: 31813172
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Publishing
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.