Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.
Austin Authors: Ogrin, Rajna;Dickins, Marissa;Johnstone, Georgina;Mortimer, Duncan;Iezzi, Angelo;Lowthian, Judy
Affiliation: Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Institute of Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry at Monash Health, Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Biosignals for Affordable Healthcare, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Issue Date: Mar-2020 2019-10-30
Publication information: Health & Social Care in the Community 2020; 28(2): 494-504
Abstract: For many populations at risk of social isolation, including Older Women Living Alone (OWLA), existing services to maintain independence and optimise well-being are difficult to access, unsuitable or unavailable. Co-creation is a strategy to develop 'person-centred' services that meet the needs of individuals. We adapted an existing framework for co-creation and used participatory action research methods, supported by an evidence base comprising a systematic review, analysis of routinely collected data and interviews, to develop person-centred services for OWLA. This approach achieved co-creation through an iterative process of consultation and review, involving a series of facilitated discussions with women living alone and stakeholders. A total of 13 women living alone, aged ≥55 years, and 11 stakeholders representing service providers and advocacy groups, were recruited to participate in these discussions. Sessions with between three and five OWLA, were held across Melbourne. The information was compiled and presented to service stakeholders in a single facilitated forum, held in central Melbourne. Smaller facilitated sessions with OWLA followed, to review and discuss the collated service stakeholder input. The information from these OWLA sessions were again compiled and directed back to the service stakeholders for consideration and further discussion. The two groups came together for a final forum to prioritise the co-created ten services that they believed would be feasible and would address unmet need to support OWLA maintain independence. The process of co-creation was time-consuming and required considerable preparation to facilitate input from the target population. Small groups, gathering at convenient local locations, with transport support were essential in removing barriers to participation. However, co-creation was a viable method of eliciting the women's preferences and developing services more likely to meet their needs.
DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12882
ORCID: 0000-0002-4192-7254
PubMed URL: 31663214
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 9, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.