Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21396
Title: Assessment and management of bone health in women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy: position statement summary.
Austin Authors: Grossmann, Mathis ;Ramchand, Sabashini K ;Milat, Frances;Vincent, Amanda;Lim, Elgene;Kotowicz, Mark A;Hicks, Jill;Teede, Helena J
Affiliation: University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
Austin Health
Barwon Health, Geelong
Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC
Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW
Consumer Representative, Breast Cancer Network Australia, Melbourne, VIC
Monash Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
Issue Date: Sep-2019
Date: 2019-07-18
Publication information: Medical Journal of Australia 2019; 211(5): 224-229
Abstract: Representatives appointed by relevant Australian medical societies used a systematic approach for adaptation of guidelines (ADAPTE) to formulate clinical consensus recommendations on assessment and management of bone health in women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy. The current evidence suggests that women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors and pre-menopausal woman treated with tamoxifen have accelerated bone loss and that women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors have increased fracture risk. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab prevent bone loss; additionally, denosumab has proven anti-fracture benefit in post-menopausal women receiving aromatase inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Women considering endocrine therapy need fracture risk assessment, including clinical risk factors, biochemistry and bone mineral density measurement, with monitoring based on risk factors. Weight-bearing exercise and vitamin D and calcium sufficiency are recommended routinely. Anti-resorptive treatment is indicated in women with prevalent or incident clinical or morphometric fragility fractures, and should be considered in women with a T score (or Z score in women aged < 50 years) of < - 2.0 at any site, or if annual bone loss is ≥ 5%, considering baseline bone mineral density and other fracture risk factors. Duration of anti-resorptive treatment can be individualised based on absolute fracture risk. Relative to their skeletal benefits, risks of adverse events with anti-resorptive treatments are low. Skeletal health should be considered in the decision-making process regarding choice and duration of endocrine therapy. Before and during endocrine therapy, skeletal health should be assessed regularly, optimised by non-pharmacological intervention and, where indicated, anti-resorptive treatment, in an individualised, multidisciplinary approach.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21396
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50280
ORCID: 0000-0001-8261-3457
0000-0001-7609-577X
0000-0001-8261-3457
Journal: Medical Journal of Australia
PubMed URL: 31318068
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Breast neoplasms
Osteoporosis
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

86
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.