Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20882
Title: A survey of the choice of general anaesthetic agents in Australia and New Zealand.
Austin Authors: McGain, Forbes;Bishop, Jason R;Elliot-Jones, Laura M;Story, David A ;Imberger, Georgina Ll
Affiliation: Western Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Western Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 2019
metadata.dc.date: 2019-05-15
Publication information: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2019; 47(3): 235-241
Abstract: Strategies to reduce the adverse environmental costs of anaesthesia include choice of agent and fresh gas flows. The current preferences of Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists are unknown. We conducted a survey of Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists to determine the use of volatiles, nitrous oxide and intravenous anaesthesia, lowest fresh gas flow rates, automated end-tidal volatile control, and the rationales for these choices. The survey was answered by 359/1000 (36%), although not all questions and multiple responses within single questions were answered by all respondents. Sevoflurane was preferred by 246/342 (72%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 67%-77%), followed by propofol, 54/340 (16%, 95% CI 12%-20%), desflurane 39/339 (12%, 95% CI 8%-16%) and isoflurane 3/338(1%, 95% CI 0-3%). When asked about all anaesthetics, low-risk clinical profile was the most common reason given for using sevoflurane (129/301 (43%, 95% CI 37%-49%)), reduced postoperative nausea for propofol (297/318 (93%, 95% CI 90%-96%)) and faster induction/awakening times for desflurane (46/313 (79%, 95% CI 74%-83%)). Two-thirds (226/340 (66%, 95% CI 61%-71%)) of respondents used nitrous oxide in 0-20% of general anaesthetics. Low fresh gas flow rates for sevoflurane were used by 310/333 (93%, 95% CI 90%-95%) and for 262/268 (98%, 95% CI 95%-99%) for desflurane. Automated end-tidal control was used by 196/333 (59%, 95% CI 53%-64%). The majority of respondents (>70%) preferred sevoflurane at low flows. These data allow anaesthetists to consider further whether changes are required to the choices of anaesthetic agents for environmental, financial, or any other reasons.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20882
DOI: 10.1177/0310057X19836104
ORCID: 0000-0002-1977-9072
0000-0002-6479-1310
PubMed URL: 31088129
ISSN: 0310-057X
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Survey
environment
financial savings
general anaesthesia
nitrous oxide
propofol
volatiles
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Dec 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.