Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20349
Title: Towards a Core Outcome Measurement Set for Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group.
Austin Authors: Owen, Claire E ;Yates, Max;Twohig, Helen;Muller, Sara;Neill, Lorna M;Harrison, Eileen;Shea, Beverley;Simon, Lee S;Hill, Catherine L;Mackie, Sarah L
Affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville Victoria, Australia
Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Rheumatology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
PMR-GCA Scotland, Dundee, Angus, United Kingdom
PMR-GCA North East, Kibblesworth, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
SDG LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
NIHR-Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
Issue Date: 1-Feb-2019
metadata.dc.date: 2019-02-01
Publication information: The Journal of rheumatology 2019; online first: 1 February
Abstract: To report the progress of the OMERACT Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Working Group in selecting candidate instruments for a core outcome measurement set. A systematic literature review identified outcomes measured and instruments used in PMR studies, and a respondent survey and raw data analysis assessed their domain match and feasibility. Candidate instruments were identified for pain (VAS/NRS), stiffness (VAS/NRS and duration) and physical function (HAQ-DI/MHAQ). Domain match and feasibility assessments were favourable, however validation in PMR was lacking. Further assessment of candidate instruments is required prior to recommending a PMR core outcome measurement set.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20349
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181050
PubMed URL: 30709960
ISSN: 0315-162X
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Nov 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.