Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18771
Title: | Feasibility and effectiveness of computerised cognitive training for memory dysfunction following stroke: A series of single case studies. | Austin Authors: | Withiel, Toni D;Wong, Dana;Ponsford, Jennie L;Cadilhac, Dominique A;Stolwyk, Renerus J | Affiliation: | Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre , Epworth Healthcare , Melbourne , Australia School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia School of Psychology and Public Health , La Trobe University , Melbourne , Australia Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health |
Issue Date: | Jun-2020 | Date: | 2018-07-30 | Publication information: | Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2020; 30(5): 829-852 | Abstract: | Computerised cognitive training (CCT) approaches to memory rehabilitation represent an attractive alternative to traditional approaches; however, there is limited empirical evidence to support their use. An AB with follow up single case design was repeated across five participants to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of CCT on subjective memory in patients with stroke. Target behaviour was subjective everyday and prospective memory failures which were assessed weekly. Following baseline (three weeks), participants completed six weeks of LumosityTM training in their homes. Data were analysed visually and statistically. The frequency of prospective memory failures decreased during intervention for one participant, while the frequency of prospective and everyday memory failures decreased significantly during the follow up period for another participant. Yet, significantly more everyday and prospective memory failures were reported following training by one study participant. No significant change in subjective memory ratings was found for remaining participants. Regarding secondary outcomes, meaningful changes on objective measures of memory were not observed, despite considerable inter-individual variability. Three participants reported improvement in individualised memory goals, while two participants described a decline. Overall, LumosityTM training appears feasible; however, no consistent evidence to support effectiveness of this CCT on subjective or objective memory was found. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18771 | DOI: | 10.1080/09602011.2018.1503083 | ORCID: | 0000-0001-8075-2760 0000-0001-9619-1929 0000-0003-0430-125X 0000-0001-8162-682X 0000-0002-4975-3332 |
Journal: | Neuropsychological rehabilitation | PubMed URL: | 30058468 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Computerised cognitive training memory rehabilitation single case design Stroke |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.