Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17537
Title: RDoC and shift of reference.
Austin Authors: Castro-de-Araujo, Luis F S;Levy, Neil;Kanaan, Richard A A 
Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil
Macquarie University, Department of Philosophy, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
Issue Date: Oct-2016
metadata.dc.date: 2016-05-03
Publication information: Australasian psychiatry 2016; 24(5): 470-472
Abstract: This paper aims to analyse in a philosophically informed way the recent National Institute of Mental Health proposal for the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Current classification systems have helped unify psychiatry and the conditions that it is most concerned with. However, by relying too much on syndromes and symptoms, they too often do not define stable constructs. As a result, inclusions and removals from the manuals are not always backed by sound reasons. The RDoC framework is an important move towards ameliorating matters. This paper argues that it improves the current situation by re-referencing constructs to physical properties (biomarkers for disorders, for example), by allowing theoretical levels within the framework, and by treating psychiatry as a special case of the cognitive sciences.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17537
DOI: 10.1177/1039856216646229
ORCID: 0000-0003-0992-1917
PubMed URL: 27145797
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
classification
latent attributes
nosography
nosology
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Dec 2, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.