| Title |
|
Coagulation in acutely ill patients with severe chronic liver disease: insights from thromboelastography |
|
|
| Publication Date |
|
| Author(s) |
|
| Subject |
|
Global coagulation assays |
|
|
| Type of document |
|
| OrcId |
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
|
|
| DOI |
|
10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.030 |
|
|
| Abstract |
|
Background and aims
There is controversy about the true coagulation state of acutely ill patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) due to simultaneous pro- and anticoagulant factor deficits and limitations of conventional coagulation tests (CCTs). Thromboelastography (TEG) may provide more physiologically relevant insights.
Methods
In acutely ill patients with severe (Child-Pugh C) CLD, we conducted a prospective observational study of daily coagulation assessment with both CCTs and TEG.
Results
We studied 34 patients with CLD on a total of 109 occasions (median of 3 samples per patient), comparing findings with 157 healthy controls. Conventional coagulation tests and TEG both demonstrated clear hypocoagulability. Thromboelastography-confirmed delayed clot formation was demonstrated by longer reaction time (1.1 minutes vs 0.6 minutes on rapid TEG; P < .01), longer kinetic time (2.9 minutes vs 1.3; P < .01), more acute α angle (65° vs 72.2°; P < .01), and longer activated clotting time (157 seconds vs 105 seconds; P < .01). Patients with CLD demonstrated weaker thrombus strength (maximum amplitude, 43.3 mm vs 61.8 mm; P < .01) and reduced clot lysis (0% vs 1% on rapid TEG; P < .01).
Conclusions
In acutely ill patients with CLD, TEG demonstrates delayed clot formation and weaker thrombus strength despite decreased clot lysis. This challenges the notion that such patients experience a balanced coagulation state, highlighting the complexity of their coagulopathies. |
|
|
| Link |
|
| Citation |
|
Journal of Critical Care 2017; 38: 215-224 |
|
|
| Jornal Title |
|