Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16376
Title: Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes
Austin Authors: Middleton, James W;Piccenna, L;Lindsay Gruen, R;Williams, S;Creasey, G;Dunlop, S;Brown, D ;Batchelor, Peter Egerton;Berlowitz, David J ;Coates, S;Dunn, JA;Furness, JB;Galea, MP;Geraghty, T;Kwon, BK;Urquhart, S;Yates, D;Bragge, P
Affiliation: John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
National Trauma Research Institute, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Monash University, Melboume, Victoria, Australia
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
The Spinal Cord Injury Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
Experimental and Regenerative Neuroscience, School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
The Spinal Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
State Rehabilitation Service, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Rehabilitation Medicine, Canberra Hospital and Health Services, Garran, ACT, Australia
Issue Date: Oct-2015
metadata.dc.date: 2015-06-23
Publication information: Spinal Cord 2015; 53(10): 729–737
Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Focus Group. OBJECTIVES: To develop a unified, regional spinal cord injury (SCI) research strategy for Australia and New Zealand. SETTING: Australia. METHODS: A 1-day structured stakeholder dialogue was convened in 2013 in Melbourne, Australia, by the National Trauma Research Institute in collaboration with the SCI Network of Australia and New Zealand. Twenty-three experts participated, representing local and international research, clinical, consumer, advocacy, government policy and funding perspectives. Preparatory work synthesised evidence and articulated draft principles and options as a starting point for discussion. RESULTS: A regional SCI research strategy was proposed, whose objectives can be summarised under four themes. (1) Collaborative networks and strategic partnerships to increase efficiency, reduce duplication, build capacity and optimise research funding. (2) Research priority setting and coordination to manage competing studies. (3) Mechanisms for greater consumer engagement in research. (4) Resources and infrastructure to further develop SCI data registries, evaluate research translation and assess alignment of research strategy with stakeholder interests. These are consistent with contemporary international SCI research strategy development activities. CONCLUSION: This first step in a regional SCI research strategy has articulated objectives for further development by the wider SCI research community. The initiative has also reinforced the importance of coordinated, collective action in optimising outcomes following SCI.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16376
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.87
ORCID: 0000-0003-2543-8722
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26099211
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Biomedical Research
Research Design
Spinal Cord Injuries
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Jun 19, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.