Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A systematic review of ileal conduit and neobladder outcomes in primary bladder cancer
Austin Authors: Crozier, Jack;Hennessey, Derek;Sengupta, Shomik ;Bolton, Damien M ;Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Oct-2016
Date: 2016-06-29
Publication information: Urology 2016; 96: 74-79
Abstract: Treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer with curative intent includes radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review assessing differences in patient selection, operative parameters, complications, and quality of life between ileal conduit and neobladder cohorts. Ileal conduit cohorts have more advanced age and disease, more comorbidities and complications, and poorer quality of life. Ileal conduit surgery is associated with adverse patient selection that inhibits reasonable comparison of outcomes with neobladder cohorts. Despite this, we observe longer operative times and hospital stays in neobladder cohorts, perhaps reflecting greater technical difficulty and the need for postoperative bladder training.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.034
ORCID: 0000-0002-5145-6783
Journal: Urology
PubMed URL:
Type: Journal Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Reviews/Systematic Reviews
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Apr 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.