Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Physical activity preferences for people living with multiple myeloma: A qualitative study
Austin Authors: Craike, Melinda;Hose, Kaye;Courneya, Kerry S;Harrison, Simon J;Livingston, Patricia M
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 16-Aug-2016 2016-08-16
Publication information: Cancer Nursing 2016; online first: 16 August
Abstract: Background: Although physical activity (PA) has significant benefits for people living with multiple myeloma (MM), participation rates are low. Examination of PA preferences will provide important information to clinicians and assist in the development of interventions to increase participation in PA for people living with MM. Objective: The aim of this study is to gain an in-depth understanding of the PA preferences for people living with MM, including the preferred role of clinicians. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients treated for MM within the preceding 2 to 12 months. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis, where coding categories were derived directly from the text data. Results: Twenty-four interviews were conducted (women, 54%; age: mean [SD], 62 [8.8] years); 16 (67%) participants had an autologous stem cell transplant. Lightto moderate-intensity PA during and after treatment was feasible, with the strongest preference for a program 2 to 8 months after treatment. The timing of information delivery was important, as was input from clinicians and organizations with knowledge of MM. Preferences for location, structure, and timing of programs varied. Conclusions: Low- to moderate-intensity PA after treatment is likely to interest people with MM. Programs need to be flexible and consider individual differences in PA preferences, functional status, and treatment schedules. Implications: An individually tailored PA program should form part of clinical care, involving clinicians and organizations with expertise in MM. Options for home-based PA are also important. Further research, including a population-based study of people living with MM, is necessary to further quantify PA preferences.
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000425
PubMed URL:
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Exercise
Multiple myeloma
Physical activity
Quality of life
Supportive care
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.