Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12318
Title: A meta-analysis of ear-acupuncture, ear-acupressure and auriculotherapy for cigarette smoking cessation.
Austin Authors: Di, Yuan Ming;May, Brian H;Zhang, Anthony Lin;Zhou, Iris Wenyu;Worsnop, Christopher J ;Xue, Charlie C L
Affiliation: Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
School of Health Sciences, Traditional & Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3081, Australia
Issue Date: 11-Jul-2014
Publication information: Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2014; 142(): 14-23
Abstract: This systematic review evaluated the effects of ear acupuncture, ear acupressure and auriculotherapy for cigarette smoking cessation (SC) at end-of-treatment (EoT), three, six and 12 months follow-up.Searches of six English and Chinese databases located 25 randomized controlled trials (3735 participants). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias. Meta-analyses were conducted in two pools: 1. SC-specific ear acupuncture/acupressure or auriculotherapy (EAP/R) vs. non-specific/inactive control; and 2. SC-specific EAP/R vs. other SC-specific treatment. Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on the validity of interventions as SC-specific treatments or non-specific/inactive interventions; and the use of biochemical SC confirmation.Pool 1: the 12 valid SC-specific EAP/R interventions were superior to inactive EAP/R controls at EoT (RR=1.77 [1.39, 2.25]), three months follow-up (RR=1.54 [1.14, 2.08]), and six months follow-up (RR=2.01, [1.23, 3.28]) but data were insufficient at 12 months. In Pool 2: there was no superiority or inferiority for EAP/R at EoT or at 3 and 6 month follow-ups compared to SC-specific behavioural therapy or SC-specific body acupuncture.Pool 1 data appeared most consistent for studies of ear acupressure (EAPR) vs. non-specific EAPR controls, with confirmed SC rates at 3 months post-treatment of 20.0% for test groups vs. 7.5% for controls. In Pool 2 the EAP/R interventions appeared neither inferior nor superior to the behavioural interventions at 3 and 6 month follow-ups. However, meta-analysis results derived from relatively small-sized trials with no biochemical validation of SC in Pool 2. Larger, well-controlled studies using biochemical confirmation of SC are needed.
Gov't Doc #: 25064021
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12318
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.002
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25064021
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Cigarette
Ear acupressure
Ear acupuncture
Smoking
Systematic review
Tobacco
Acupressure
Acupuncture, Ear
Auriculotherapy
Humans
Smoking.therapy
Smoking Cessation.methods
Treatment Outcome
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Mar 4, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.