Austin Health

Title
Everolimus for previously treated advanced gastric cancer: results of the randomized, double-blind, phase III GRANITE-1 study.
Publication Date
2013-09-16
Author(s)
Ohtsu, Atsushi
Ajani, Jaffer A
Bai, Yu-Xian
Bang, Yung-Jue
Chung, Hyun-Cheol
Pan, Hong-Ming
Sahmoud, Tarek
Shen, Lin
Yeh, Kun-Huei
Chin, Keisho
Muro, Kei
Kim, Yeul Hong
Ferry, David
Tebbutt, Niall C
Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin
Smith, Heind
Costantini, Chiara
Rizvi, Syed
Lebwohl, David
Van Cutsem, Eric
Type of document
Journal Article
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2012.48.3552
Abstract
The oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus demonstrated promising efficacy in a phase II study of pretreated advanced gastric cancer. This international, double-blind, phase III study compared everolimus efficacy and safety with that of best supportive care (BSC) in previously treated advanced gastric cancer.Patients with advanced gastric cancer that progressed after one or two lines of systemic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d (assignment schedule: 2:1) or matching placebo, both given with BSC. Randomization was stratified by previous chemotherapy lines (one v two) and region (Asia v rest of the world [ROW]). Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, and safety.Six hundred fifty-six patients (median age, 62.0 years; 73.6% male) were enrolled. Median OS was 5.4 months with everolimus and 4.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.08; P = .124). Median PFS was 1.7 months and 1.4 months in the everolimus and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78). Common grade 3/4 adverse events included anemia, decreased appetite, and fatigue. The safety profile was similar in patients enrolled in Asia versus ROW.Compared with BSC, everolimus did not significantly improve overall survival for advanced gastric cancer that progressed after one or two lines of previous systemic chemotherapy. The safety profile observed for everolimus was consistent with that observed for everolimus in other cancers.
Link
Citation
Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013; 31(31): 3935-43
Jornal Title
Journal of Clinical Oncology

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink