Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11306
Title: Selecting appropriate voxel-based methods for neuroimaging studies.
Austin Authors: Abbott, David F ;Pell, Gaby S;Pardoe, Heath R;Jackson, Graeme D 
Affiliation: Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Melbourne Brain Centre, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 6-Jul-2011
Publication information: Neuroimage 2011; 59(2): 885-6
Abstract: We highlight a fundamental difference between voxel-based methods that interrogate signal intensity directly and those that interrogate morphometric features; we discuss how signal intensity changes might erroneously affect morphometric measures, and we provide some guidance for selection of appropriate methods to address particular hyphotheses. Our discussion is motivated by a recent application of voxel-based morphometry methods to T2-weighted images (T2-Voxel Based Morphometry; T2-VBM). In this context we discuss alternative approaches including Voxel-Based T2-Relaxometry (VBR) and Voxel Based Iterative Sensitivity analysis of T2-Weighted Images (VBIS-T2).
Gov't Doc #: 21763436
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11306
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.083
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21763436
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Alzheimer Disease.pathology
Brain.pathology
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted.methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional.methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging.methods
Male
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on Nov 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.