Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression.|
|Authors:||Buist, Anne;Condon, John;Brooks, Janette;Speelman, Craig;Milgrom, Jeannette;Hayes, Barbara A;Ellwood, David;Barnett, Bryanne;Kowalenko, Nick;Matthey, Stephen;Austin, Marie-Paule V;Bilszta, Justin L C|
|Affiliation:||University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry Austin Health, Repat Campus PO Box 5444, West Heidelberg, Victoria, 3061, Australia. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Citation:||Journal of Affective Disorders 2006; 93(1-3): 233-7|
|Abstract:||To assess the acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression.Postnatal women (n=860) and health professionals (n=916) were surveyed after 3 years of routine perinatal (antenatal and postnatal) use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).Over 90% of women had the screening explained to them and found the EPDS easy to complete; 85% had no difficulties completing it. Discomfort with screening was significantly related to having a higher EPDS score. A majority of health professionals using the EPDS was comfortable and found it useful.The sample involved only maternity services supporting depression screening. In addition, the response rate from GPs was low.Routine screening with the EPDS is acceptable to most women and health professionals. Sensitive explanation, along with staff training and support, is essential in implementing depression screening.|
|Internal ID Number:||16647761|
Attitude of Health Personnel
Patient Acceptance of Health Care.psychology
Patient Education as Topic
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.