Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26428
Title: Possible high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (pHSIL) in the new cervical screening paradigm: The outcomes and the role of clinicopathological review.
Austin Authors: McGauran, Monica Francesca Giannini;Pendlebury, Adam Bernard;Hiscock, Richard John;Lamont, Julie M;Jones, Antonia P M;Grant, Peter;Newman, Marsali R ;Ireland-Jenkin, Kerryn ;McGrath, Shaun;Pham, Kim;Hyde, Simon
Affiliation: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Anatomical Pathology
Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Mercy Hospital for Women, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Mercy Perinatal, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 3-May-2021
Date: 2021-05-03
Publication information: The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2021; 61(4): 569-575
Abstract: A renewed National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) was introduced in Australia in December 2017. Under the renewed NCSP, there are limited data to guide the management of discordant colposcopy and biopsy results after a liquid-based cytology (LBC) finding of 'possible high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion' (pHSIL). This study aims to determine the proportion of women referred with pHSIL who are found to have HSIL, identify influencing factors of women most at risk, and examine the role that cytopathology review plays in management decisions. Two-hundred and thirty-two women presenting to a tertiary women's hospital in Australia with pHSIL since December 2017 were identified. Women with HSIL following colposcopy directed biopsy were referred for treatment. When HSIL was not identified, these patients were referred for multidisciplinary clinicopathological review. Pathological outcomes and treatment recommendations are included. The primary outcome of the study was histological confirmation of HSIL. Primary outcome data were available for 182 women (78.5%); 62 (34.1%) had HSIL on histology, three (1.7%) had adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and one (1%) had cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). There was no association between age and the presence of HSIL. The presence of human papillomavirus 16 and/or 18 increased the likelihood of HSIL on histology (relative risk 1.9; 95% CI 1.27-2.80, P = 0.002). Fifty-nine (25.4%) women were referred for observation who had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/no dysplasia. Clinicopathological review optimises management and triage of patients with pHSIL on referral cytology. Understanding outcomes in these patients informs counselling and management.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26428
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13348
ORCID: 0000-0002-2556-0755
Journal: The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
PubMed URL: 33939180
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: ASC-H atypical squamous cell
HPV infection
cervical intraepithelial neoplasm
cervical smear
pHSIL
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.