Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20521
Title: Pulmonary Rehabilitation does not Improve Objective Measures of Sleep Quality in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Authors: Cox, Narelle S;Pepin, Véronique;Burge, Angela T;Hill, Catherine J;Lee, Annemarie L;Bondarenko, Janet;Moore, Rosemary;Nicolson, Caroline;Lahham, Aroub;Parwanta, Zohra;McDonald, Christine F;Holland, Anne E
Affiliation: Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
Monash University, Frankston, Australia
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Discipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Axe Maladies Chroniques, Centre de Recherche de l'Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Issue Date: 19-Mar-2019
EDate: 2019
Citation: COPD 2019: online first: 19 March
Abstract: Abnormal sleep duration is associated with poor health. Upwards of 50% of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report poor sleep quality. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on self-reported sleep quality is variable. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on objectively measured sleep quality (via actigraphy) in people with COPD. Sleep quality was assessed objectively using the SenseWear Armband (SWA, BodyMedia, Pittsburgh, PA), worn for ≥4 days before and immediately after completing an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program. Sleep characteristics were derived from accelerometer positional data and registration of sleep state by the SWA, determined from energy expenditure. Forty-eight participants (n = 21 male) with COPD (mean (SD), age 70 (10) years, mean FEV1 55 (20) % predicted, mean 45 (24) pack year smoking history) contributed pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation sleep data to this analysis. No significant differences were seen in any sleep parameters after pulmonary rehabilitation (p = 0.07-0.70). There were no associations between sleep parameters and measures of quality of life or function (all p > 0.30). Sleep quality, measured objectively using actigraphy, did not improve after an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program in individuals with COPD. Whether on-going participation in regular exercise training beyond the duration of pulmonary rehabilitation may influence sleep quality, or whether improving sleep quality could enhance rehabilitation outcomes, is yet to be determined.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20521
DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1567701
ORCID: 0000-0003-2090-0746
0000-0001-6481-3391
0000-0003-2061-845X
PubMed URL: 30884984
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: COPD
actigraphy
pulmonary rehabilitation
sleep
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.