Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhor, Yet H-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Raymond-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.date2018-11-06-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T00:52:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-26T00:52:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-06-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory care 2018; online first: 6 November-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19908-
dc.description.abstractHome oxygen therapy is commonly prescribed for patients who remain hypoxemic at hospital discharge, although evidence supporting this practice is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate oxygen prescription and follow-up for patients who were prescribed post-discharge short-term oxygen therapy (STOT) and to assess their long-term outcome. A retrospective audit was undertaken of subjects prescribed STOT following hospitalization at a single site in Melbourne, Australia, between January 2011 and December 2015. During the study period, a designated clinical pathway for STOT prescription and follow-up after hospital discharge was in place. Chart review was performed to collect subject demographics and comorbidities, results of oxygen assessment (arterial blood gas and 6-min walk tests) and prescription, and results at follow-up re-assessment and mortality. Over five 5 years, 205 subjects were prescribed STOT upon hospital discharge. Common indications for oxygen treatment were chronic lung disease (54%) and dyspnea palliation (26%). Of the 152 subjects who were discharged with non-palliative oxygen therapy, 28% did not fulfil the recommended prescribing criteria or did not have recommended assessments. Among the 118 subjects who attended for re-assessment 4 weeks after initial oxygen provision, 47 (40%) did not fulfill criteria for long-term oxygen therapy. The 1-y cumulative survival rate for the study population was 56%. A significant proportion of subjects who were prescribed post-discharge STOT did not fulfill the recommended prescribing criteria. The long-term prognosis for subjects who were prescribed post-discharge STOT was poor.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCOPD-
dc.subjectlong-term oxygen therapy-
dc.subjectoxygen-
dc.subjectpalliative care-
dc.subjectpost-discharge-
dc.subjectprognosis-
dc.subjectshort-term oxygen therapy-
dc.titlePost-Hospitalization Short-Term Oxygen Therapy: Use of a Clinical Management Pathway and Long-Term Follow-Up.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespiratory care-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.06303-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6481-3391en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5434-9342en
dc.identifier.pubmedid30401753-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.