Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhor, Yet H-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Raymond-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.date2018-11-06-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T00:52:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-26T00:52:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Care 2019; 64(3): 272-278en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19908-
dc.description.abstractHome oxygen therapy is commonly prescribed for patients who remain hypoxemic at hospital discharge, although evidence supporting this practice is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate oxygen prescription and follow-up for patients who were prescribed post-discharge short-term oxygen therapy (STOT) and to assess their long-term outcome. A retrospective audit was undertaken of subjects prescribed STOT following hospitalization at a single site in Melbourne, Australia, between January 2011 and December 2015. During the study period, a designated clinical pathway for STOT prescription and follow-up after hospital discharge was in place. Chart review was performed to collect subject demographics and comorbidities, results of oxygen assessment (arterial blood gas and 6-min walk tests) and prescription, and results at follow-up re-assessment and mortality. Over five 5 years, 205 subjects were prescribed STOT upon hospital discharge. Common indications for oxygen treatment were chronic lung disease (54%) and dyspnea palliation (26%). Of the 152 subjects who were discharged with non-palliative oxygen therapy, 28% did not fulfil the recommended prescribing criteria or did not have recommended assessments. Among the 118 subjects who attended for re-assessment 4 weeks after initial oxygen provision, 47 (40%) did not fulfill criteria for long-term oxygen therapy. The 1-y cumulative survival rate for the study population was 56%. A significant proportion of subjects who were prescribed post-discharge STOT did not fulfill the recommended prescribing criteria. The long-term prognosis for subjects who were prescribed post-discharge STOT was poor.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCOPDen_US
dc.subjectlong-term oxygen therapyen_US
dc.subjectoxygenen_US
dc.subjectpalliative careen_US
dc.subjectpost-dischargeen_US
dc.subjectprognosisen_US
dc.subjectshort-term oxygen therapyen_US
dc.titlePost-Hospitalization Short-Term Oxygen Therapy: Use of a Clinical Management Pathway and Long-Term Follow-Up.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespiratory Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRespiratory and Sleep Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.06303en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6481-3391en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5434-9342en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid30401753-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherKhor, Yet H
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.