Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwakkel, Gert-
dc.contributor.authorLannin, Natasha A-
dc.contributor.authorBorschmann, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Coralie-
dc.contributor.authorAli, Myzoon-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorSaposnik, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorWinstein, Carolee-
dc.contributor.authorvan Wegen, Erwin E H-
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Steven L-
dc.contributor.authorKrakauer, John W-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-24T02:03:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-24T02:03:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.citationNeurorehabilitation and neural repair 2017; 31(9): 784-792-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17754-
dc.description.abstractFinding, testing and demonstrating efficacy of new treatments for stroke recovery is a multifaceted challenge. We believe that to advance the field, neurorehabilitation trials need a conceptually rigorous starting framework. An essential first step is to agree on definitions of sensorimotor recovery and on measures consistent with these definitions. Such standardization would allow pooling of participant data across studies and institutions aiding meta-analyses of completed trials, more detailed exploration of recovery profiles of our patients and the generation of new hypotheses. Here, we present the results of a consensus meeting about measurement standards and patient characteristics that we suggest should be collected in all future stroke recovery trials. Recommendations are made considering time post stroke and are aligned with the international classification of functioning and disability. A strong case is made for addition of kinematic and kinetic movement quantification. Further work is being undertaken by our group to form consensus on clinical predictors and pre-stroke clinical data that should be collected, as well as recommendations for additional outcome measurement tools. To improve stroke recovery trials, we urge the research community to consider adopting our recommendations in their trial design.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectClinical research-
dc.subjectinternational-
dc.subjectoutcomes-
dc.subjectrecommendations-
dc.subjectrecovery-
dc.subjectStroke-
dc.titleStandardized Measurement of Sensorimotor Recovery in Stroke Trials: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Newcastle School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitutes of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke Outcomes Research & Center for Virtual Reality Studies ( www.sorcan.ca )-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry and Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta; VA Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta, GA, USA-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Neurology, Neuroscience, and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1545968317732662-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2543-8722-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9807-6606-
dc.identifier.pubmedid28934918-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBorschmann, Karen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.