Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16599
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David McD-
dc.contributor.authorGrover Johnson, Olivia-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorDing, Juen Li-
dc.contributor.authorAshok, Aadith-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-09T00:55:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-09T00:55:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-
dc.identifier.citationEmergency Medicine Journal 2016; 33(7): 453-457en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16599-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide pain advice ('The treatment of pain is very important and be sure to tell the staff when you have pain') as an intervention and evaluate its effect upon patient satisfaction. The purpose of this pilot trial was to ensure the design and methods of a future trial are sound, practicable and feasible. METHOD: We undertook a pilot, randomised, controlled, clinical intervention trial in a single ED. The control arm received standard care. The intervention arm received standard care plus pain advice from an independent investigator. All patients and treating ED staff were blinded to patient enrolment. Patient satisfaction with their pain management (six-point ordinal scale) was measured 48 h post-ED discharge, by a blinded researcher. The primary outcome was satisfaction with pain management. RESULTS: Of the 280 and 275 patients randomised to the control and intervention arms, respectively, 196 and 215 had complete data, respectively. 77.6% (152/196) and 88.8% (191/215) of patients reported being provided with pain advice, respectively (difference 11.3% (95% CI 3.6 to 19.0)). The intervention was associated with absolute and relative increases in patient satisfaction of 6.3% and 14.2%, respectively. 91.3% (179/196) and 76.3% (164/215) of patients who were/were not very satisfied reported having received 'pain advice' (difference 15.0% (95% CI 7.6 to 22.5)). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention to provide pain advice resulted in a non-significant increase in patient satisfaction. A larger multicentre trial is feasible and is recommended to further explore the effects of provision of pain advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000097549.en_US
dc.subjectAnalgesia/pain controlen_US
dc.subjectPain managementen_US
dc.titleThe effect of provision of pain management advice on patient satisfaction with their pain management: a pilot, randomised, controlled trial (pain advice trial)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEmergency Medicine Journalen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialRandomized Controlled Clinical Trial/Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26951644en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2015-205365en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherTaylor, David McD
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on Apr 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.