Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12530
Title: Hepatic resection: value of operative ultrasound and ultrasonic dissection.
Austin Authors: Hardy, Kenneth John;Martin, J;Fletcher, D R;MacLellan, D G;Jones, Robert M 
Affiliation: Surgery
Issue Date: 1-Aug-1989
Publication information: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery; 59(8): 621-3
Abstract: Twenty-five patients having a major liver resection at the Austin Hospital were reviewed, 18 of whom had their operation after 1986. The indications were for metastatic disease in 14, hydatid in six and primary tumour in five. There were no operative deaths. Dissection was performed with the Cavitron Ultrasound Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) and peroperative ultrasound used in 18 and without in seven. Mean blood loss was 1.75 u in the CUSA group and 6.5 u in the non-CUSA group (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that intra-operative ultrasound and use of the CUSA makes major liver resection a more precise and less hazardous procedure.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12530
ORCID: 
Journal: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2548466
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma.diagnosis.secondary.surgery
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.diagnosis.secondary.surgery
Colonic Neoplasms
Echinococcosis, Hepatic.diagnosis.surgery
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Liver.pathology
Liver Neoplasms.diagnosis.surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Suction.instrumentation
Ultrasonography
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.