Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10212
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Emma J-
dc.contributor.authorGrabsch, Elizabeth A-
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Susan A-
dc.contributor.authorMayall, Barrie C-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Shirley-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Rhea D-
dc.contributor.authorGrayson, M Lindsay-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:35:27Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:35:27Z
dc.date.issued2006-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Microbiology; 44(8): 2904-8en_US
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10212en
dc.description.abstractThe IDI-MRSA assay (Infectio Diagnostic, Inc., Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada) with the Smart Cycler II rapid DNA amplification system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) appears to be sensitive and specific for the rapid detection of nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of this assay under conditions in which both the nose and cutaneous groin specimens were analyzed together and compared the accuracy of this PCR approach to that when these specimens were tested separately and by culture assays in an inpatient population with known high rates (12 to 15%) of MRSA colonization. Of 211 patients screened, 192 had results assessable by all three methods (agar-broth culture, separate nose and groin IDI-MRSA assay, and combined nose-groin IDI-MRSA assay), with MRSA carriage noted in 31/192 (16.1%), 41/192 (21.4%), and 36/192 (18.8%) patients by each method, respectively. Compared to agar culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the combined nose-groin IDI-MRSA assay were 88.0% and 91.6%, respectively, whereas when each specimen was processed separately, the sensitivities were 90.0% (nose) and 83.3% (groin) and the specificities were 91.7% (nose) and 90.2% (groin). IDI-MRSA assay of a combined nose-groin specimen appears to have an accuracy similar to that of the current recommended PCR protocol, providing results in a clinically useful time frame, and may represent a more cost-effective approach to using this assay for screening for MRSA colonization.en_US
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherGroin.microbiologyen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMethicillin Resistance.geneticsen
dc.subject.otherNose.microbiologyen
dc.subject.otherPolymerase Chain Reaction.methodsen
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcal Infections.diagnosis.microbiologyen
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcus aureus.drug effects.genetics.growth & development.isolation & purificationen
dc.titleConcurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/JCM.02211-05en_US
dc.description.pages2904-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16891510en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherGrabsch, Elizabeth A
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on May 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.