Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConway, Elizabeth Len
dc.contributor.authorAnavekar, S Nen
dc.contributor.authorHowes, L Gen
dc.contributor.authorLouis, William Jen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:12:21Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:12:21Z
dc.date.issued1992-05-01en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Pharmacology; 32(5): 427-33en
dc.identifier.govdoc1587960en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9920en
dc.description.abstractThe pharmacokinetic characteristics of a slow-release formulation of clonidine (150 micrograms) were compared with those of a conventional formulation (75 micrograms) after acute and chronic (2 week) administration to 12 hypertensive subjects. The Tmax of the slow-release formulation was significantly later than for the conventional formulation after both acute (8.3 +/- 6 hr vs. 2.1 +/- 2 hr) and chronic administration (4.0 +/- 3 hr vs. 2.5 +/- 2 hr). Although the Tmax did not change significantly with acute and chronic administration of the conventional preparation, it was significantly shorter after chronic administration of the slow-release formulation when acute and chronic administration were compared. The Cmax was approximately 60% lower for the slow-release formulation (1 x 150 micrograms; 0.42 +/- 0.09 ng/mL) compared with the conventional formulation (2 x 75 micrograms; 0.70 +/- 0.12 ng/mL) after acute administration, whereas in the steady state, in which the dose of the conventional preparation was halved (75 micrograms), the Cmax values were comparable: 1 x 150 micrograms-0.99 +/- 0.27 ng/mL, 1 x 75 micrograms-0.84 +/- 0.20 ng/mL and the dose-normalized interdose AUC were identical for the conventional (16.2 +/- 4.3 ng/mL.hr) and slow release (16.6 +/- 5.3 ng/mL.hr) products. T1/2 values for the conventional formulation of clonidine exceeded 20 hours in all but one subject and were considerably longer than those in previous reports, including those of the authors, in which a less sensitive assay was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherClonidine.administration & dosage.blood.pharmacokineticsen
dc.subject.otherDelayed-Action Preparationsen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherHypertension.drug therapyen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherNorepinephrine.blooden
dc.titlePharmacokinetic comparison of a slow-release clonidine with a conventional formulation after acute and chronic administration in hypertensives.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of clinical pharmacologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.pages427-33en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1587960en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherLouis, William J
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.