1. AHRO : Austin Health Research Online
  2. Austin Health research
  3. Journal articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9625
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilberstein, Men
dc.contributor.authorTress, B Men
dc.contributor.authorHennessy, O Fen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T22:47:28Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T22:47:28Z
dc.date.issued1992-08-01en
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Radiology; 36(3): 192-7en
dc.identifier.govdoc1445100en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9625en
dc.description.abstractMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 0.3T and Computed Tomography (CT) were compared in the retrospective evaluation of 34 patients with acute spinal cord injury. MRI was highly accurate in the imaging of vertebral body fracture, and spondylitic changes, and is the method of choice for imaging ligament injury, traumatic disc protrusion and spinal cord compression. It was also useful for the identification of subtle subluxations in the sagittal plane. CT remains the method of choice for imaging neural arch fractures. MRI at 0.3T is a valid technique for assessing patients with acute spinal trauma.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAcute Diseaseen
dc.subject.otherAdolescenten
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherChilden
dc.subject.otherDislocations.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherEdema.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLigaments.injuries.pathology.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherMagnetic Resonance Imaging.methodsen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Cord Compression.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Cord Injuries.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Fractures.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Injuries.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Osteophytosis.diagnosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherTomography, X-Ray Computed.methodsen
dc.titleA comparison between M.R.I. and C.T. in acute spinal trauma.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralasian radiologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.pages192-7en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1445100en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.