Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Margaret Aen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Douglas Jen
dc.contributor.authorIerino, Francesco Len
dc.contributor.authorRatnaike, Sujiva Ien
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T22:38:57Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T22:38:57Z
dc.date.issued2003-07-01en
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry; 40(Pt 4): 364-8en
dc.identifier.govdoc12880536en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9524en
dc.description.abstractSerum creatinine is not a satisfactory marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who have varying degrees of muscle atrophy. In contrast to serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, a 13-kDa protein, is not affected by muscle mass and is therefore potentially a useful marker of GFR in patients with SCI. In addition, cystatin C is not dependent on sex or age and is not secreted by the renal tubule.We assessed serum cystatin C as a surrogate marker of GFR in SCI patients.Cystatin C was analysed using a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (Dade Behring) in serum samples sent for routine measurement of creatinine (64 patients) and creatinine clearance (27 patients) from patients in the Spinal Unit of the Austin Health. We compared these results with serum cystatin C of 57 non-SCI patients who had had a creatinine clearance measurement during the study period.In patients with SCI, the reciprocal of cystatin C had a stronger correlation (r = 0.48, P<0.01) with creatinine clearance than the reciprocal of serum creatinine (r = 0.25, P<0.19). Further, the value of serum creatinine was much lower for a given creatinine clearance in SCI patients than in non-SCI patients; the serum cystatin C concentrations were equivalent.The serum cystatin C is a convenient and more reliable surrogate marker of GFR than serum creatinine and will enable early detection of renal impairment. We need to confirm this finding with a larger study, including comparison with an accepted gold standard for GFR.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherBiological Markers.blooden
dc.subject.otherCase-Control Studiesen
dc.subject.otherCreatinine.analysis.blooden
dc.subject.otherCystatin Cen
dc.subject.otherCystatins.blooden
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGlomerular Filtration Rateen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherKidney Diseases.diagnosis.etiologyen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherNephelometry and Turbidimetryen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Cord Injuries.complicationsen
dc.titleCystatin C for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with spinal cord injury.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnnals of clinical biochemistryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg 3084 Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1258/000456303766476995en
dc.description.pages364-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12880536en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.