Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9242
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, S Gen
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Cen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Den
dc.contributor.authorSormann, Gen
dc.contributor.authorFlood, Sen
dc.contributor.authorDenison, Men
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T22:15:36Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T22:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2000-08-01en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery; 70(8): 563-8en
dc.identifier.govdoc10945548en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9242en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to document the value of an implanted multichannel neuroprosthesis (Freehand System) for restoring hand grasp in the first Australians to receive this device.Hand function in C5 quadriplegic patients was assessed via measurement of pinch forces, a grasp release test and tests of activities of daily living (ADL). Comparisons were made between presurgery scores and scores recorded after rehabilitation when the neuroprosthesis was and was not in use.A significant difference for both lateral pinch (P = 0.003) and palmar grasp (P = 0.003) was found between forces recorded with and without the use of the neuroprosthesis after rehabilitation, but not between forces recorded presurgery and during rehabilitation without the neuroprosthesis. All subjects were able to grasp, move and release more objects within the 30-s test period with the neuroprosthesis than without it. Collective results for the eight ADL tests for all six subjects show that, in 35 of the 48 (73%) occasions, less physical assistance and/or adaptive equipment was required when the Freehand system was employed compared to when it was not used. In 41 of the 48 (85%) occasions, the six subjects expressed a preference for using the neuroprosthesis to perform these activities of daily living. Twelve months after rehabilitation, five of the six subjects still used the neuroprosthesis daily or every second day.The Freehand neuroprosthesis has provided useful hand function with few surgical and technical difficulties in these patients. Regular ongoing use of the device indicates user satisfaction.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherActivities of Daily Livingen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAustraliaen
dc.subject.otherElectric Stimulation Therapy.adverse effects.instrumentation.methodsen
dc.subject.otherElectrodes, Implanteden
dc.subject.otherEquipment Designen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHand.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherHand Strengthen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherPatient Selectionen
dc.subject.otherQuadriplegia.classification.physiopathology.rehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherSeverity of Illness Indexen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleAustralian experience with the Freehand System for restoring grasp in quadriplegia.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Australiaen
dc.description.pages563-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10945548en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBrown, Doug
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Spinal Cord Service-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.