Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35603
Title: The Effects of Angiotensin II versus Norepinephrine on Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Cardiac Surgery: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Austin Authors: Lim, Jolene;Zhang, Kathy;Miles, Lachlan F ;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Coulson, Tim G 
Affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.
Anaesthesia
Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Intensive Care
Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Data Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre
Issue Date: Dec-2024
Date: 2024
Publication information: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2024-12; 38(12)
Abstract: To assess whether angiotensin II infusion increases pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) relative to norepinephrine. Secondary analysis of a double-blinded randomized feasibility study. Two tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Fifty-eight adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass with an elevated risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Angiotensin II infusion compared with norepinephrine infusion. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of PVR both intraoperatively and postoperatively between the angiotensin II group and the norepinephrine group. The study drug (angiotensin II or norepinephrine) infusion rate was associated with a small increase in PVR (β = 0.08; p = 0.01). The strongest association with PVR was the random effect (ie, patient effect) (p < 0.001). This effect was consistent across secondary outcomes. Randomization to norepinephrine instead of to angiotensin II was associated with reduced mean systemic arterial to mean pulmonary arterial pressure ratio postoperatively (β = -0.65; p = 0.01). The results of this study suggest that in cardiac surgery patients and at doses used in the prior feasibility study, angiotensin II did not have significant effects on the pulmonary vasculature compared with norepinephrine. Moreover, at doses used in this study, neither drug appeared to have a substantial effect on the pulmonary circulation relative to surgical and patient factors.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35603
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.148
ORCID: 
Journal: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Start page: 2950
End page: 2958
PubMed URL: 39489662
ISSN: 1532-8422
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: angiotensin II
cardiac surgery
cardiopulmonary bypass
norepinephrine
pulmonary arterial pressure
pulmonary vascular resistance
vasopressors
Norepinephrine/therapeutic use
Norepinephrine/administration & dosage
Angiotensin II/pharmacology
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
Vascular Resistance/drug effects
Vascular Resistance/physiology
Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.