Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35058
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Jessica F-
dc.contributor.authorMcAlister, Scott-
dc.contributor.authorEckelman, Matthew J-
dc.contributor.authorMcGain, Forbes-
dc.contributor.authorSeglenieks, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorGutman, Elena N-
dc.contributor.authorGroome, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorPalipane, Natasha-
dc.contributor.authorLatoff, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Dominic-
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Jodi D-
dc.date2024-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T04:14:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T04:14:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-30-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Anaesthesia 2024-01-30en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35058-
dc.description.abstractPharmaceuticals account for 19-32% of healthcare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Paracetamol is a common perioperative analgesic agent. We estimated GHG emissions associated with i.v. and oral formulations of paracetamol used in the perioperative period. Life-cycle assessment of GHG emissions (expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents CO2e) of i.v. and oral paracetamol preparations was performed. Perioperative paracetamol prescribing practices and costs for 26 hospitals in USA, UK, and Australia were retrospectively audited. For those surgical patients for whom oral formulations were indicated, CO2e and costs of actual prescribing practices for i.v. or oral doses were compared with optimal oral prescribing. The carbon footprint for a 1 g dose was 38 g CO2e (oral tablet), 151 g CO2e (oral liquid), and 310-628 g CO2e (i.v. dependent on type of packaging and administration supplies). Of the eligible USA patients, 37% received paracetamol (67% was i.v.). Of the eligible UK patients, 85% received paracetamol (80% was i.v.). Of the eligible Australian patients, 66% received paracetamol (70% was i.v.). If the emissions mitigation opportunity from substituting oral tablets for i.v. paracetamol is extrapolated to USA, UK, and Australia elective surgical encounters in 2019, ∼5.7 kt CO2e could have been avoided and would save 98.3% of financial costs. Intravenous paracetamol has 12-fold greater life-cycle carbon emissions than the oral tablet form. Glass vials have higher greenhouse gas emissions than plastic vials. Intravenous administration should be reserved for cases in which oral formulations are not feasible.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectlife-cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectparacetamolen_US
dc.subjectperioperative medicineen_US
dc.subjectpharmaceuticalsen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental and financial impacts of perioperative paracetamol use: a multicentre international life-cycle analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBritish Journal of Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Nuffield Health, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationGreener Anaesthesia & Sustainability Project (GASP), London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.053en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid38296752-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Oct 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.