Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34437
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Siyu-
dc.contributor.authorOng, Sean-
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Dean-
dc.contributor.authorMirabelli, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorChen, David C-
dc.contributor.authorChengodu, Thilakavathi-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declan G-
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Michael S-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-13T05:24:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-13T05:24:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-28-
dc.identifier.citationProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2023-11-28en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-5608-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34437-
dc.description.abstractProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has become an increasingly established imaging modality in the staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Numerous PSMA-based tracers are currently available, however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal radiotracer(s) for PSMA PET/CT. This study aims to investigate whether Fluorine-18 (18F)-labelled PSMA PET/CT is significantly different from Gallium-68 (68Ga) in primary diagnosis and/or secondary staging of prostate cancer following biochemical recurrence. A critical review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed in May 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies that directly compared 18F-based PSMA radiotracers and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in terms of the normal organ SUV or the lesion SUV or the detection rate were assessed. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Twenty-four studies were analysed. [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]PSMA-1007 were the two most commonly studied 18F based PSMA tracers. [18F]JK-PSMA-7, [18F]rhPSMA-7, [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 were the new tracers evaluated in a limited number of studies. Overall, [18F]DCFPyL was observed to have a similar lesion detection rate to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with no increase in false positive rates. [18F]PSMA-1007 was found to have a greater local lesion detection rate because of its predominant hepatobiliary excretory route. However, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was observed to have a similar local lesion detection rate in studies that administer patients with furosemide prior to the scan. In addition, [18F]PSMA-1007 was found to have a significant number of benign bone uptakes. [18F]DCFPyL was observed to be similar to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. [18F]PSMA-1007 was observed to be less preferrable to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 due to its high benign bone uptakes. Overall, there was not enough evidence in differentiating the radiotracers based on their clinical impacts.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleComparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationResearch Development & Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationProstate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Young Urology Researchers Organisation (YURO), Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationProstate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.;EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41391-023-00755-2en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9488-2726en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7500-5899en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8622-159Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1138-6389en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid38017295-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.