Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34233
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArkell, Thomas R-
dc.contributor.authorManning, Brooke-
dc.contributor.authorDowney, Luke A-
dc.contributor.authorHayley, Amie C-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T05:28:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-15T05:28:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-09-
dc.identifier.citationCNS Drugs 2023; 37(11)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1179-1934-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34233-
dc.description.abstractMedical cannabis use is increasing in Australia and other jurisdictions, yet little is known about the effects of medical cannabis on cognitive function. Findings from studies of non-medical ('recreational') cannabis may not be applicable to patients using prescribed medical cannabis to manage a health condition. In this semi-naturalistic, open-label trial, patients with various health conditions attended a single laboratory session in which they self-administered a standard dose of prescribed medical cannabis as per instructions on the pharmacy label. We assessed cognitive performance using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and Druid application (app) prior to and following (CANTAB: + 3 h; Druid: + 3 and 5.5 h) medical cannabis self-administration. We also assessed subjective drug effects prior to and following (1, 2 and 4 h) medical cannabis self-administration using a range of 0-10 cm visual analogue scales ('stoned', 'sedated', 'relaxed', 'comfortable', 'anxious' and 'confident'). Data were analyzed using linear fixed-effect models. Participants (N = 40; 22 females) were prescribed a range of products including orally administered oils (n = 23) and flower for vaporization (n = 17). Participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 41.38 (12.66) years and had been using medical cannabis for a mean (SD) of 10.18 (8.73) months. Chronic non-cancer pain was the most common indication for medical cannabis use (n = 20), followed by sleep disorder (n = 18) and anxiety (n = 11). The mean (SD) delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD) dose administered by participants was 9.61 (8.52) mg/9.15 (10.11) mg among those using an oil, and 37.00 (24.53) mg/0.38 (1.58) mg among those who vaporized flower, respectively. Participants' performance improved over time on the CANTAB Multitasking Test and Rapid Visual Information Processing test (both p-values <0.001). All other changes in cognitive performance measures over time were non-significant (p > 0.05). Vaporization of flower was associated with significantly stronger subjective feelings of 'stoned' and 'sedated' relative to oils (both p < 0.001). These findings suggest that prescribed medical cannabis may have minimal acute impact on cognitive function among patients with chronic health conditions, although larger and controlled trials are needed.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleA Semi-Naturalistic, Open-Label Trial Examining the Effect of Prescribed Medical Cannabis on Neurocognitive Performance.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleCNS Drugsen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, m 1009, ATC Building, 427-451 Burwood Rd, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC, 3122, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40263-023-01046-zen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8559-6995en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5233-8191en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5670-3192en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4470-4718en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37945917-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

66
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.