Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorCliff, Edward R Scheffer-
dc.contributor.authorMohyuddin, Ghulam Rehman-
dc.contributor.authorPopat, Rakesh-
dc.contributor.authorMidha, Shonali-
dc.contributor.authorLiet Hing, Melissa Ng-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Simon J-
dc.contributor.authorKesselheim, Aaron S-
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Benjamin W-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T03:29:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T03:29:42Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-10-
dc.identifier.citationBlood Advances 2023-10-10; 7(19)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2473-9537-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34023-
dc.description.abstractBispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell markers, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), FcRH5, and G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5D. These bispecific antibodies so effectively deplete plasma cells (and to some extent T-cells) that patients are at increased risk of developing infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infections in published studies of patients with myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies was conducted to better characterize the infection risks. A literature search used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify relevant studies between inception and February 10, 2023, including major conference presentations. Phase 1b-3 clinical trials and observational studies were included. Sixteen clinical trials comprising 1666 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.6 months and 38% of the cohort had penta-drug refractory disease. Pooled prevalence of all-grade infections was 56%, whereas the prevalence of grade ≥3 infections was 24%. Patients who were treated with BCMA-targeted bispecifics had significantly higher rates of grade ≥3 infections than non-BCMA bispecifics (25% vs 20%). Similarly, patients treated with bispecifics in combination with other agents had significantly higher rate of all-grade infection than those receiving monotherapy (71% vs 52%). In observational studies (n = 293), excluded from the primary analysis to ensure no overlap with patients in clinical trials, several infections classically associated with T-cell depletion were identified. This systematic review identifies BCMA-targeted bispecifics and bispecific combination therapy as having higher infection risk, requiring vigilant infection screening and prophylaxis strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleInfections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBlood Advancesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Myeloma, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010539en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9561-3592en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5977-907Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6464-783Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4555-6582en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8867-2666en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0213-5470en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37467036-
dc.description.volume7-
dc.description.issue19-
dc.description.startpage5898-
dc.description.endpage5903-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryMultiple Myeloma/drug therapy-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryMultiple Myeloma/pathology-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryAntibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryB-Cell Maturation Antigen/therapeutic use-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Nov 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.