Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34010
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeijkoop, Bridget-
dc.contributor.authorChislett, Bodie-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.contributor.authorEsler, Stephen J-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, David Rowan-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T03:29:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T03:29:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.citationBJUI Compass 2023-11; 4(6)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2688-4526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34010-
dc.description.abstractTo review the management of patients with neurogenic bladder undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) at our institution with the aim of assessing peri-operative morbidity. We conducted a retrospective review of all neurogenic bladder patients who underwent PCNL at our hospital in the last decade with the aim of assessing peri-operative morbidity. A total of 298 PCNL were performed during the study period of which 58 were in patients with a neurogenic bladder or urinary diversion, 33 of which were in SCI patients. Preoperative demographic and stone characteristics, intraoperative data and postoperative length of stay and complications are summarised in table form. PCNL remains an acceptably safe and efficacious treatment for upper tract stone disease in patients with neurogenic bladders and will continue to have a valuable role where SCI prevents alternative approaches such as ureteroscopy.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectPCNLen_US
dc.subjectneurogenic bladderen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectrenal stonesen_US
dc.subjectspinal cord injuryen_US
dc.titlePCNL in neurogenic bladder: A challenging population for both clinical management and analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJUI Compassen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUrologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bco2.268en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6348-5445en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1138-6389en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37818030-
dc.description.volume4-
dc.description.issue6-
dc.description.startpage695-
dc.description.endpage700-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptRadiology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.