Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33961
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChua, Kyra Y L-
dc.contributor.authorYang, May-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Lillian-
dc.contributor.authorKnox, James-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Lai-Yang-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T06:21:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-11T06:21:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.citationPathology 2023-12; 55(7)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1465-3931-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33961-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates collected prospectively from urine specimens over a 2-month period from September to October 2022 at a single centre in Melbourne, Australia. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates underwent phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and VITEK2, and mecA polymerase chain reaction. A total of 302 S. saprophyticus isolates from 298 patients were included in this study. Most specimens (91.1%) were referred by community general practitioners from non-hospitalised patients. Antimicrobial resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics was uncommon; trimethoprim susceptibility was 97%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 98%; nitrofurantoin, 100%; and ciprofloxacin, 100% (100% ciprofloxacin susceptible, increased exposure by EUCAST breakpoints). Methicillin resistance (by mecA detection) was the most common form of urinary antibiotic resistance at 5.6%. VITEK2 susceptibility testing for methicillin resistance had a poor specificity of 61.8% (95% CI 55.8-67.4%) compared to mecA detection. These findings indicate that empiric antibiotic recommendations of trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nitrofurantoin for treatment of urinary S. saprophyticus remain appropriate.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectStaphylococcus saprophyticusen_US
dc.subjectmethicillin resistanceen_US
dc.subjecturineen_US
dc.titleAntimicrobial resistance and its detection in Staphylococcus saprophyticus urinary isolates.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePathologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Vic, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Vic, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.006en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37793963-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptMicrobiology-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.