Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33945
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeickhardt, Andrew J-
dc.contributor.authorForoudi, Farshad-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorSidhom, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorPal, Abhijit-
dc.contributor.authorGrimison, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Alison-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Siobhan-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Colin-
dc.contributor.authorHovey, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Colin-
dc.contributor.authorHruby, George-
dc.contributor.authorGuminski, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorMcJannett, Margaret-
dc.contributor.authorConduit, Ciara-
dc.contributor.authorTran, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Ian D-
dc.contributor.authorHayne, Dickon-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T06:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-11T06:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-06-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Urology Oncology 2023-10-06en_US
dc.identifier.issn2588-9311-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33945-
dc.description.abstractRadiation may improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition. This study investigates the combination of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation (CRT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). To assess the feasibility and safety of pembrolizumab combined with CRT for MIBC. A single-arm phase 2 trial was performed with 28 participants having cT2-T4aN0M0 MIBC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1; estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40 ml/min; no contraindications to pembrolizumab) suitable for CRT. Whole bladder radiation therapy (RT; 64 Gy in 32 daily fractions, over 6.5 wk, combined with cisplatin (35 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] weekly, six doses) and pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3 weeks, seven doses), both starting with RT. Surveillance cystoscopy/biopsy and computerised tomography scans performed 12 and 24 wk after CRT. The primary endpoint was feasibility, determined by a prespecified satisfactory low rate of grade 3 or worse nonurinary toxicity or completion of planned CRT according to defined parameters. Secondary endpoints were complete cystoscopic response, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled with a 31-mo median follow-up. Six had Grade >3 nonurinary adverse events during/within 12 wk after treatment; three had more than one cisplatin dose reduction. The 24-wk post-CRT complete response (CR) rate was 88%. Eight patients developed metastatic disease, and three had nonmetastatic progression. The DMFS at 2 yr is 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54-90%), with LRPFS at 2 yr of 87% (95% CI 64-96%) and median OS of 39 mo (95% CI 17.1-not evaluable). Limitations are the single-arm design and sample size. Combining pembrolizumab with CRT for MIBC was feasible, with manageable toxicity and promising CR rates. Immunotherapy treats nonmetastatic/metastatic bladder cancer effectively. We combined pembrolizumab with chemotherapy and radiation to assess its safety and impact on treatment delivery. The combination was feasible with encouraging early activity. Further larger trials are warranted.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectBladder canceren_US
dc.subjectChemoradiationen_US
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_US
dc.titlePembrolizumab with Chemoradiation as Treatment for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of the PCR-MIB Phase 2 Clinical Trial (ANZUP 1502).en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Urology Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationLiverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.011en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37806844-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.