Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33745
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorFaris, Mona-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Joanne-
dc.contributor.authorHalkett, Georgia K B-
dc.contributor.authorLegge, Dianne-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Eng-Siew-
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Anna K-
dc.contributor.authorAgar, Meera R-
dc.contributor.authorOwnsworth, Tamara-
dc.contributor.authorPike, Kerryn E-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond J-
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Haryana M-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T07:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-20T07:00:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-
dc.identifier.citationNeuro-oncology Practice 2023-10; 10(5)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33745-
dc.description.abstractPeople living with high-grade glioma (HGG) have diverse and complex needs. Screening aims to detect patients with some level of unmet need requiring triaging and further assessment. However, most existing measures of unmet need are not suitable for screening in this population due to their length. We aimed to explore the clinical utility of a brief screening tool (SCNS-ST9) in people with HGG in detecting unmet needs. Secondary analysis of data collected in a prospective cohort study of 116 people with HGG who completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) and a brain cancer-specific needs survey (BrTSCNS) during chemoradiation (T1) and 6 months later (T2). The SCNS-ST9 contains a subset of 9 items from the SCNS-SF34. Data analysis determined the number of individuals with unmet needs on the SCNS-SF34 and the BrTSCNS, not identified as having some level of need by the SCNS-ST9. Overall, 3 individuals (T1: 2.6% [3/116]; T2: 4.8% [3/63]) at each time point reported other unmet needs on the SCNS-SF34 that were missed by the SCNS-ST9. Domain-specific screening items missed a higher proportion of individuals (3.2%-26%), particularly in the psychological and health systems domains. Only 1 individual with brain cancer-specific needs was missed by SCNS-ST9 overall. Findings demonstrate the sensitivity and clinical utility of a brief screening tool (SCNS-ST9) of unmet needs in people with HGG. Routine use of this screening tool, supported by clinical pathways, may improve access to support services, potentially reducing the burden of disease for these patients.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectbrain canceren_US
dc.subjecthigh-grade gliomaen_US
dc.subjectscreeningen_US
dc.subjectsupportive careen_US
dc.subjectunmet needsen_US
dc.titleExploring the clinical utility of a brief screening measure of unmet supportive care needs in people with high-grade glioma.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeuro-oncology Practiceen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCurtin School of Nursing/ Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.;Oliva Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSouth West Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.;Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centers, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.;Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.;Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.;Cancer Symptom Trials Group, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Australia.;Griffith Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.;School of Psychology and Public Health and John Richards Center for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/nop/npad035en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1664-2513en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4039-5169en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37720397-
dc.description.volume10-
dc.description.issue5-
dc.description.startpage454-
dc.description.endpage461-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.