Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33622
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuchlak, Quinlan D-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Cyril H M-
dc.contributor.authorSeah, Jarrel C Y-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorHolt, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorBottrell, Georgina M-
dc.contributor.authorWardman, Jeffrey B-
dc.contributor.authorSamarasinghe, Gihan-
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos Pinheiro, Leonardo-
dc.contributor.authorXia, Hongze-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Hassan K-
dc.contributor.authorPham, Hung-
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Jason I-
dc.contributor.authorEktas, Nalan-
dc.contributor.authorMilne, Michael R-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Christopher H Y-
dc.contributor.authorHachey, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Melissa K-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Benjamin P-
dc.contributor.authorEsmaili, Nazanin-
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Christine-
dc.contributor.authorGoldschlager, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorHall, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorVo, Duc Tan-
dc.contributor.authorOakden-Rayner, Lauren-
dc.contributor.authorLeveque, Jean-Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorFarrokhi, Farrokh-
dc.contributor.authorAbramson, Richard G-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Catherine M-
dc.contributor.authorEdelstein, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorBrotchie, Peter-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T07:48:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T07:48:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-22-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology 2023-08-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33622-
dc.description.abstractNon-contrast computed tomography of the brain (NCCTB) is commonly used to detect intracranial pathology but is subject to interpretation errors. Machine learning can augment clinical decision-making and improve NCCTB scan interpretation. This retrospective detection accuracy study assessed the performance of radiologists assisted by a deep learning model and compared the standalone performance of the model with that of unassisted radiologists. A deep learning model was trained on 212,484 NCCTB scans drawn from a private radiology group in Australia. Scans from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings were included. Scan inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and series slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm. Thirty-two radiologists reviewed 2848 scans with and without the assistance of the deep learning system and rated their confidence in the presence of each finding using a 7-point scale. Differences in AUC and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated using a ground-truth gold standard. The model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 across 144 NCCTB findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. Assisted and unassisted radiologists demonstrated an average AUC of 0.79 and 0.73 across 22 grouped parent findings and 0.72 and 0.68 across 189 child findings, respectively. When assisted by the model, radiologist AUC was significantly improved for 91 findings (158 findings were non-inferior), and reading time was significantly reduced. The assistance of a comprehensive deep learning model significantly improved radiologist detection accuracy across a wide range of clinical findings and demonstrated the potential to improve NCCTB interpretation. This study evaluated a comprehensive CT brain deep learning model, which performed strongly, improved the performance of radiologists, and reduced interpretation time. The model may reduce errors, improve efficiency, facilitate triage, and better enable the delivery of timely patient care. • This study demonstrated that the use of a comprehensive deep learning system assisted radiologists in the detection of a wide range of abnormalities on non-contrast brain computed tomography scans. • The deep learning model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 across 144 findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. • The assistance of the comprehensive deep learning model significantly reduced the time required for radiologists to interpret computed tomography scans of the brain.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectBrainen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectSupervised machine learningen_US
dc.subjectTomography, x-ray computeden_US
dc.titleEffects of a comprehensive brain computed tomography deep learning model on radiologist detection accuracy.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Radiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationWestmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, St Vincent's Health Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCenter for Neurosciences and Spine, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public and Preventive Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationI-MED Radiology Network, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-023-10074-8en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6749-3223en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37606663-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.