Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSkrifvars, Markus B-
dc.contributor.authorLuethi, Nora-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Craig-
dc.contributor.authorNichol, Alistair-
dc.contributor.authorTrapani, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, Colin-
dc.contributor.authorArabi, Yaseen M-
dc.contributor.authorBendel, Stepani-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, David J-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T02:52:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-14T02:52:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-05-
dc.identifier.citationIntensive Care Medicine 2023-07-05; 49(7)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1238-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33290-
dc.description.abstractRecombinant erythropoietin (EPO) administered for traumatic brain injury (TBI) may increase short-term survival, but the long-term effect is unknown. We conducted a pre-planned long-term follow-up of patients in the multicentre erythropoietin in TBI trial (2010-2015). We invited survivors to follow-up and evaluated survival and functional outcome with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) (categories 5-8 = good outcome), and secondly, with good outcome determined relative to baseline function (sliding scale). We used survival analysis to assess time to death and absolute risk differences (ARD) to assess favorable outcomes. We categorized TBI severity with the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI model. Heterogeneity of treatment effects were assessed with interaction p-values based on the following a priori defined subgroups, the severity of TBI, and the presence of an intracranial mass lesion and multi-trauma in addition to TBI. Of 603 patients in the original trial, 487 patients had survival data; 356 were included in the follow-up at a median of 6 years from injury. There was no difference between treatment groups for patient survival [EPO vs placebo hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 (0.47-1.14) p = 0.17]. Good outcome rates were 110/175 (63%) in the EPO group vs 100/181 (55%) in the placebo group (ARD 8%, 95% CI [Formula: see text] 3 to 18%, p = 0.14). When good outcome was determined relative to baseline risk, the EPO groups had better GOSE (sliding scale ARD 12%, 95% CI 2-22%, p = 0.02). When considering long-term patient survival, there was no evidence for heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) according to severity of TBI (p = 0.85), presence of an intracranial mass lesion (p = 0.48), or whether the patient had multi-trauma in addition to TBI (p = 0.08). Similarly, no evidence of treatment heterogeneity was seen for the effect of EPO on functional outcome. EPO neither decreased overall long-term mortality nor improved functional outcome in moderate or severe TBI patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). The limited sample size makes it difficult to make final conclusions about the use of EPO in TBI.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectErythropoietinen_US
dc.subjectNeurological outcomeen_US
dc.subjectTraumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.titleThe effect of recombinant erythropoietin on long-term outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleIntensive Care Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, PB 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern, Kuopio, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00134-023-07141-5en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0341-0262en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37405413-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.